| Feature | fireflies ai | otter ai |
|---|---|---|
| Free Tier | ||
| CRM Integration | ||
| AI Summaries | ||
| Custom Vocabulary | ||
| Video Clips | ||
| API Access | Business plan | Pro plan |
| Mobile App |
If you’re choosing between Fireflies and Otter for a sales team, this comparison is straightforward: Fireflies wins.
If you’re choosing between them for general meeting transcription across a whole company, Otter has some advantages worth considering. The real-time collaboration features and mobile recording app are better than Fireflies’ equivalents.
Here’s the full breakdown so you can decide based on your actual needs.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Fireflies.ai | Otter.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Sales teams, CRM automation | General meetings, collaboration |
| Free plan | 800 min storage, limited summaries | 300 min/month, 30-min cap |
| Sales team tier | $19/mo (Business, annual) | $20/mo (Business, annual) |
| CRM sync | HubSpot + Salesforce ($19/mo) | Salesforce + HubSpot ($20/mo) |
| Conversation intelligence | Yes (Business) | Basic (Business, newer features) |
| Transcription languages | 100+ | English, French, Spanish |
| Conferencing platforms | 10+ | 3 (Zoom, Meet, Teams) |
| Mobile recording | Limited | Strong (iOS and Android apps) |
| Real-time collaboration | Basic | Best in category |
| G2 rating | 4.8 | 4.3 |
For Sales Teams: Fireflies
The reason is simple: Fireflies was built with sales workflows in mind. The Business plan at $19/user/month includes:
- CRM sync that pushes structured summaries (not just transcript dumps) to HubSpot and Salesforce
- Conversation intelligence: talk-time ratios, topic tracking, question detection
- Support for 10+ conferencing platforms (sales teams join calls on whatever tool the prospect uses)
- 100+ transcription languages (for international sales teams)
Otter’s Business plan ($20/user/month) has recently added sales-specific features like CRM sync, extracted sales insights, and live call coaching. These are welcome additions, but they’re newer and less battle-tested than Fireflies’ implementations. User reviews suggest Otter’s sales features work but aren’t as refined.
The G2 ratings tell a story: Fireflies at 4.8 vs Otter at 4.3. That gap reflects years of sales teams choosing Fireflies over Otter for this exact use case.
For General Meetings: Otter Has an Edge
Where Otter genuinely wins:
Real-time collaborative editing. Multiple people can annotate, highlight, and comment on a live transcript simultaneously during a meeting. Fireflies doesn’t match this. For product teams, design reviews, or all-hands meetings, this is a real workflow advantage.
Mobile recording. Otter’s iOS and Android apps are built for in-person recording. You can transcribe meetings, interviews, lectures, and conversations that happen outside of virtual meeting platforms. Fireflies is primarily designed for virtual meetings.
Automated slide capture. Otter captures slides from screen shares during virtual meetings and embeds them in the transcript timeline. Useful for teams that present frequently.
The Price Comparison
For individuals: Neither free plan is great. Otter gives 300 min/month with a 30-minute cap per meeting. Fireflies gives 800 minutes of storage with limited AI summaries. Both are restrictive. Use Fathom instead (unlimited everything for free).
For a 10-person team needing transcription + CRM:
- Fireflies Business: $190/month (annual)
- Otter Business: $200/month (annual)
Nearly identical pricing. But Fireflies includes more mature conversation intelligence, supports more conferencing platforms, and transcribes in 100+ languages vs Otter’s 3. For sales teams, Fireflies delivers more value at a similar price.
For a 10-person team needing only transcription (no CRM):
- Fireflies Pro: $100/month (annual)
- Otter Pro: $83.30/month (annual)
Otter Pro is slightly cheaper if you don’t need CRM sync or conversation intelligence. But Fireflies Pro includes unlimited integrations and talk-time analytics that Otter Pro doesn’t.
Language and Platform Support
This is where the gap is widest.
Fireflies: 100+ transcription languages, 10+ conferencing platforms (Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex, BlueJeans, Skype, Dialpad, and more).
Otter: English, French, and Spanish only. 3 conferencing platforms (Zoom, Meet, Teams).
For any team with international clients, multilingual meetings, or non-standard conferencing platforms, Fireflies is the only option.
Known Issues
Otter: Users report transcription gaps on long meetings - missing chunks of audio, not just inaccuracy. Also, Reddit threads mention aggressive upselling and confusing settings that default to sharing behavior you might not want.
Fireflies: English-only interface (though transcription supports 100+ languages). Crosstalk handling is mediocre. Free plan is too limited for real evaluation.
The Verdict
For sales teams, Fireflies. Better CRM integration, more mature conversation intelligence, broader platform and language support, and higher user satisfaction (4.8 vs 4.3 on G2).
For company-wide meeting transcription with collaboration features, Otter has advantages in real-time editing, mobile recording, and slide capture that Fireflies doesn’t match.
For individuals on a budget, skip both and use Fathom for free.
Pricing last verified: March 18, 2026. Some links are affiliate links. How I make money.
fireflies ai
Based on our testing, fireflies ai is the stronger overall choice. See the category-by-category breakdown above for specific use cases where the other tool may be a better fit.